Proffit v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[11] The appellant raises five issues in the appeal of his conviction on eight counts of third-degree sexual assault 1 Finding numerous prejudicial errors in the proceedings below, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

ISSUES

[12] 1. Did plain error oceur when a State witness testified that the appellant refused to take a polygraph test and terminated the interview by asking for an attorney?

2. Did plain error occur when the prosecutor committed misconduct by:

a. Cross-examining the appellant by asking whether other witnesses were lying?

b. Cross-examining the appellant by…