Legal Opinion
Meeker v. Johnson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 1891No. 319PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court Lewis County. Action by E. Meeker and Fred. Meeker, under the firm name of E. Meeker & Co., against Ira Johnson, to recover possession of certain hops which plaintiffs claimed under a contract of sale. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered hy
Dunbab, J.
The articles of agreement out of which this action grew are as follows:
“This agreement, made and entered into this ninth day of August, 1890, by and between Ira Johnson, of Napavine, county of Lewis, and state of Washington, party of the first part, and E. Meeker & Company, of Puyallup, in the county of Pierce, State of Washington, parties of the second part:
“Witnesseth, that the said party of the first part, for the consideration hereinafter named, has sold, transferred and set over, and by these presents does sell, transfer and. set over,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Morse v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Foster v. RopesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Graff v. FitchIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Hale v. HuntleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Armour v. SeixasWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Dawson v. Baum, Washington Territory1888
- Graffius v. TottenhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
- Pacific Power, & Light Co. v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Tingley v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.