Legal Opinion

People v. Emmons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1913No. Docket No. 165PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Clinton; Searl, J. Elmer E. Emmons was convicted of violating the law relative to the sale of intoxicating liquors in a county that had adopted prohibition.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

At the January term, 1913, of the circuit court of Clinton county, respondent was convicted, by the verdict of a jury, under an information charging that on August 30, 1912, at the city of St. Johns, in said county, he unlawfully sold to one Charles Lance “a certain quantity of malt, brewed, fermented, spirituous liquor, to wit, two gallons of cider.” The provisions of the local option law are, and then were, in force in said county. No question is, nor so far as the record discloses can be, raised as to the sufficiency of the information or regularity of the proceedings leading up to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Eureka Vinegar Co. v. Gazette Printing Co.United States Circuit Court · 1888
  4. People v. HatingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. People v. WorgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. EngleMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. McCoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Elms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. People v. HeideMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. People v. PalluchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API