Legal Opinion

People v. Kinney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1900PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Van Burén; Smith, J. Matthew Kinney was convicted of violating the local-option law.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The local-option law is in force in Van Burén county. The respondent was convicted under an information charging him with having on the 5th day of October, *4871899, at the township of Decatur, Van Burén county, sold and furnished to S. C. Maybury and Edward Bass a certain quantity of fermented, spirituous, and intoxicating' liquor, to wit, one gallon of hard cider.

The people offered proofs tending to show that, on the evening of October 5th, Maybury and Bass went where respondent resided, and there, in his cellar, purchased from him one gallon of fermented cider, paid for it, and went back…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reed v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. State v. HemrichWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Nix v. City of AndalusiaAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Gallaghan v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  5. State v. DascenzoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API