People v. Adams
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Van Burén. (Buck, J.) Respondent was convicted of selling fermented cider in violation of tbe local option law. Tbe facts are stated-in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Respondent was convicted of selling fermented cider, contrary to tbe provisions of a resolution *542adopted by the board of supervisors of the county of Van Burén in pursuance of the provisions of Act No. 207, Laws of 1889, and contrary to the provisions of said act.
The information is good. The allegation that the sale was contrary to the provisions of a resolution adopted by the board of supervisors pursuant to the provisions of the act is a'sufficient allegation that the act had been made and was operative. It is not .usually necessary in an information, in referring to a statute, to allege…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- State v. VolmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Brownbridge v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Nason v. StaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861
3Cited by29 opinions
- Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. HensonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
- State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. FunkMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.