Legal Opinion

People v. Hatinger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1913No. Docket No. 147PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Montcalm; Davis, J. Ernest Hatinger was convicted of violating the local-option law.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Under an agreed statement of facts in the trial court, the respondent was convicted by a jury of a violation of the local-opt'ion law. He now seeks to have the conviction set aside by this court, on the ground that it is at variance with the law.

It appears from the stipulation of facts that respondent, in the months of August and September, 1913, was operating a lunch and soft drink counter in the village of Ed-more; that he had on sale what was known as “ Old Fort Cider,” which he purchased under a- positive guaranty that it contained no alcohol; that the same was analyzed and found to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. People v. WaldvogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State v. TomasiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1895
  5. People v. IngrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. LardieMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Coleman v. State Ex Rel. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. People v. HeikkalaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API