People v. Worges
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before sentence from Bay; Collins, J. Frank C. Worges was convicted of violating the liquor law.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The respondent, a regularly licensed retail dealer in liquors in the village of Mt. Forest, Mich., was informed against for keeping his saloon open after hours on the 20th day of April, 1912. Defendant pleaded not guilty. Upon the trial of said cause by a jury, respondent was convicted and sentence deferred pending appeal to this court.
Mt. Forest is not an incorporated village. The respondent runs a hotel there in connection with his saloon business. The village of Mt. Forest has no police protection outside of one or two constables elected and residing somewhere in the township of Mt.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. SnowbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ZurekIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. HeikkalaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. EmmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. AveryMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.