Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Bowen
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1932No. Docket No. 4430PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Judgment went for the defendants in an action prosecuted by the plaintiff to recover damages for and on account of an alleged conversion of a crop of prunes. From this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
On the twenty-seventh day of October, 1926, the Shasta Orchard and Farm Company, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the “Orchard Company”, was the owner of a certain farm in the county of Shasta, comprising about 600 acres. The Orchard Company was a corporation owned by the family of Harry S. Bates. Harry S. Bates was the president and managing agent. His son, Merrill Bates, was the secretary. His…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- White v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Bank of Amador CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Nettles v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Earp v. EarpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hyde Park Savings & Loan Co. v. CowlesOhio Court of Appeals · 1960