Legal Opinion

Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Bank of Amador County

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1933No. Docket No. 4970PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This action involves the question of whether the beneficiary of the deed of trust conveying real' property, together with the rents, issues and profits thereof, or the holder of a subsequent crop mortgage, mortgaging the crop thereon, is entitled to the proceeds of a growing crop. Also, error of the court in admitting evidence. The defendant holding the trust deed had judgment, and from this judgment the plaintiff appeals.

The transcript shows that on or about the seventh day of August, 1930, Richard Raggio and Clayton Raggio executed a deed of trust to the respondent, the trust deed conveying…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. MacLeod v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Simpson v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Steele v. . BenhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Lofstad v. MuraskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Ventura-Louise Properties v. RothmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. In Re Marriage of TammenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Security-First National Bank v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API