Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. McMan Oil & Gas Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1928No. 887-4592PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

This ease presents the question whether or not a lessor under the mineral lease in common use in this state may recover from the lessee for gasoline manufactured from casing-head gas under the stipulation for the usual royalty on oil produced and' saved.

The suit was instituted by plaintiffs in error, the lessors, against the'defendants in error, as assignees of the original lessee, and upon the conclusion of the evidence the trial court instructed a verdict against the plaintiffs, and that judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 279 S. W. 939.

Originally, the plaintiffs’ pleadings…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. The Texas Company v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kahn v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hager v. StakesTexas Supreme Court · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Fox v. ThoresonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. BurnsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Murphy v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Southland Royalty Co. v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1964

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API