Legal Opinion

State v. Lopez-Vega

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1992No. T107388A, T107389A, T107390A CA A66599 (Control), A66600, A66601PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*254RICHARDSON, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, violation of the open container law, ORS 811.170, and driving uninsured. ORS 806.010. He challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence which was based on his argument that the stop of his car was unlawful. We affirm.

Defendant was backing his car in the parking lot of a convenience store in Hillsboro when Officer Johnson saw him accelerate rapidly, causing excessive tire noise. Johnson stopped him for violating a Hillsboro ordinance prohibiting unnecessary noise.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. DollarhideOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of Portland v. LodiOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. City of Portland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Lampley v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  3. City of Eugene v. KrukCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. City of Portland v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. Lopez-VegaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API