Will of Dolph v. Watson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.
It is the contention of the petitioners that the remainders, subject to the life interests of testator’s widow and his two daughters, vested at the testator’s death, one third in Edith May Dolph Hill, one third in Cyrus Dolph, and one third in Belle Watson, who is now the only surviving child of the testator.
The judgment of January 7, 1919, in unambiguous terms, assigns the personal property of the deceased to persons specifically named therein. The time for appeal having expired, it is a final adjudication with respect to the personal property and although erroneous, is not subject to either…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Proctor v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Estate of WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Colman v. First National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. SchoendorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- MacLean v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Greiling v. GenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. ConwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of FerdinandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.