Legal Opinion

State v. Conway

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1968No. 20PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnoe T. Hansen, J.

On June 20, 1956, defendants signed an option agreement extending an option to the State of Wisconsin (Conservation Commission) to purchase certain land. The option provided, in part:

“Upon receipt of said notice the grantor agrees to furnish at his own expense an abstract of title .... ((
“The price at which such property will be sold to the State of Wisconsin (Conservation Commission) is $16,586.50. 66
“In the event grantor fails to furnish said abstract of title within 60 days after delivery or mailing of the notice of acceptance to him the grantee may procure such abstract at the expense of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stowell v. EldredWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Fischbeck v. MielenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. ConwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Oconto County State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Goit in the Suit of Knapp v. DickermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estreen v. BluhmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Schimmel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Home Bank v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Conway v. Division of Conservation, Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Walker v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API