Legal Opinion

Estate of Ferdinand

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Ferdinand’s will, repeating its language in the 1926 judgment, does not empower the widow to dispose of the estate by will. The language clearly expresses contrary intent and her power of disposition is limited to its exercise while she lives and is unmarried. Will of Zweifel (1927), 194 Wis. 428, 216 N. W. 840. Rights of claimants now cannot be derived from the provisions of the widow’s will.

The appellant submits that the intent of the testator as expressed in his will was to give to his widow an estate in fee subject to a contingent estate in the brothers and sisters surviving the widow. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Moran's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Schomberg v. GaenslenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Roth v. KarstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In re Albiston's EstateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Estate of FarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. David MacLeish v. Boardman & Clark LLPWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Falk v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. David MacLeish v. Boardman & Clark LLPWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API