Legal Opinion

Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Schoendorf

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1967PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

The trust estate distributable under sub-paragraph VII (3) (b) of the will of William E. Wehr, deceased, will be referred to as the “Gebhardt remainder.”

*165With the exception of respondent Hubmann, it is the position of all other parties to this appeal that there is a failure of the Gebhardt remainder because of the decease of Clara Gebhardt and her daughters prior to the death of the last life beneficiary, C. Frederic Wehr. Hubmann contends that there was no failure of the trust on two alternative grounds: (1) The remainders of the two Gebhardt daughters who survived the testator were…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Nicoll v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Upington v. . CorriganNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Fulton v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Collins EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. In re Moran's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nichols v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Estate of FarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. MacLean v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Matter of Estate of McWilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. McElligott v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API