Legal Opinion
Abate v. Barkers of Wallingford, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 10, 1967No. File No. 69718PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The third-party defendant herein has demurred to the second and third counts of the plaintiffs' amended complaint on the ground that on the face of this complaint the claims alleged are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations.
The original complaint was brought against the defendant Barkers of Wallingford, Inc., and was returned on the first Tuesday of December, 1963. It alleged a breach of warranty in the sale of a pair of defective ice skates purchased by the named plaintiff. It also alleged negligence in failing properly to inspect the condition of the skates. Thereafter, on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Massa v. NastriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Joseph J. Ricciuti v. Voltarc Tubes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Rosenau v. City of New BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
- Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.