Legal Opinion

Massa v. Nastri

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1939PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The complaint alleged in the first count that the plaintiff was a gratuitous guest in a car owned by the named defendant and operated by the other defendant, Massa, who was her husband, and was injured, July 18, 1936, through the negligence of the latter. A second count alleged reckless and heedless operation but was later withdrawn and plays no part in the present appeal. At the date of injury, § 1628 of the General Statutes was in effect and provided that no person transported in a motor vehicle as a guest without payment therefor “shall have a cause of action for damages against [the]…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lewellyn v. FrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Lewis v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Dickerson v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Stearns v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Pfau v. Trent Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. McAdams v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Muha v. United Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API