Legal Opinion
Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1964No. 21PublishedCited by 512 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
The petitioner union (IUE) and respondent employer (Westinghouse) entered into a collective bargaining agreement covering workers at several plants including one where the present dispute occurred. The agreement states that Westinghouse recognizes IUE and its locals as exclusive bargaining representatives for each of those units for which IUE or its locals have been certified by the National Labor Relations Board as the exclusive bargaining representative; and the agreement lists among those units for which IUE has been certified a unit of “all production and maintenance employees” at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by512 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. Acme Industrial Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
507 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.