Legal Opinion
Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 26, 1969No. Nos. 16624-16626, 16632PublishedCited by 367 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs are present and/or former female employees of defendant Colgate-Palmolive Company (Colgate) who were represented, for collective bargaining purposes, by defendant International Chemical Workers Union, Local No. 15 (Union) at Colgate’s Jeffersonville, Indiana, plant. Plaintiffs sued Colgate and the Union under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. charging that they were intentionally discriminated against by a system of job classification which deprived them of various opportunities in the plant and that they were subjected to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by367 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
362 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.