Legal Opinion
Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 5, 1962No. 50PublishedCited by 1,322 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
The petitioner and the respondent (which we shall call the union and the employer) were parties to a collective bargaining contract within the purview of the National Labor Relations Act. The contract contained the following provisions, among others:
“Article II
“The Employer reserves the right to discharge any man in his employ if his work is not satisfactory.
“Article XIV
“Should any difference as to the true interpretation of this agreement arise, same shall be submitted to a Board of Arbitration of two members, one representing the firm, and one representing the Union. If said members cannot…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,322 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
1,317 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.