McMullin v. McMullin
California Supreme Court
The main facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Further facts are stated in the dissenting opinion of Van Dyke, J.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for divorce on the ground of desertion. Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying her motion for a new trial.
The parties intermarried in the year 1871, but have not lived together as husband and wife since the year 1877. Plaintiff, in his complaint filed April 9, 1898, alleged a desertion by defendant on April 10, 1896, the theory of his case, as shown by the evidence, being that the separation of the parties from 1877 to some time in April, 1895, was by consent, and that in April, 1895, he, in good faith, sought a reconciliation and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Benkert v. BenkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- McMullin v. McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1911
- Minnich v. MinnichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Kenniston v. KennistonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Ruggles v. RugglesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.