Fallon v. Fallon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant appeals from an order and judgment of the superior court directing him to pay plaintiff costs and the sum of $500 for attorney’s fees, to defend an appeal perfected by defendant from a judgment denying him a divorce on his cross-complaint.
The sole contention is that the court had no evidence before it upon which to base its order. After the appeal from the judgment denying defendant a divorce was perfected, plaintiff obtained an order requiring defendant to appear and show cause why he should not be required to pay alimony pendente lite, attorney’s fees to enable plaintiff to resist…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Sweeley v. SweeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. SansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Sheard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- McLellan v. McLellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Vartanian v. CrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Cope v. CopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.