O'Meara v. Hables
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. N. Rector, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In the justice’s court of the city and county of San Francisco plaintiff sued defendant to recover the sum of two hundred and ten dollars which it was alleged was due for rental of certain premises. The complaint charged in several counts. In the first it was alleged that defendant has “occupied said premises for several years past and has paid no rent to said plaintiff since May 1, 1909.” In the third count it was charged that defendant was the assignee of a lease of the premises made by plaintiff to one John Doe Creely and that said defendant entered under the assigned lease and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Copertini v. OppermannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Boyd v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Kendis v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Morrissey v. MorrisseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Hebert v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Peninsula Rapid Transit Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924