Legal Opinion
Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1894No. 15467PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the. Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Paterson, J.—
This action was brought in the justice’s court to recover the sum of two hundred and ninety-nine dollars and ninety-nine cents on a contract which reads as follows:
“San Francisco, July 22, 1892.
“Received of J. D. Hart, Esq., one hundred ($100) dollars, in full payment for ten (10) shares of the capital stock of the San Carlos Oil Company, and our services for locating the said J. D. Hart, Esq., on the limit •of the number of acres allowed by the homestead law, not to exceed one hundred and sixty (160) acres. Said location to be on vacant government land in San Benito •county,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Santa Barbara v. EldredCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Holman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Copertini v. OppermannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Groom v. BangsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Riverside Heights Water Co. v. Riverside Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Bates v. FerrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Johnson v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Coggins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.