Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Southern California Ry. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1899No. L.A. No. 544PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. S. Royes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.

—This action was brought in Riverside county to recover one hundred dollars damages for killing a colt. Objection is made to the jurisdiction of this court, and it is stated in the briefs on both sides that the ease was originally brought in a justice’s court, was there tried, and after judgment in favor -of plaintiff was appealed to the superior court upon both law and fact. The action was tried in the superior court, and plaintiff recovered judgment for the full amount of his claim, and the defendant appeals to this court from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial. ,

All that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hart v. Carnall-Hopkins Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Holman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Enright v. The S.F. & San Jose R.R.California Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Pollock v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Copertini v. OppermannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oregon Short Line R. v. District Court of Third Judicial DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Raisch v. Sausalito Land & Ferry Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bates v. FerrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Beaudin v. Oregon Short Line RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. O'Meara v. HablesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API