Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Fisher
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 30, 1989No. 6873PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJacobson, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court, Zoarski, J., dismissing their appeal from the decision of the town of Guilford planning and zoning commission1 which granted a subdivision appli*490cation for property abutting that of the plaintiffs. They claim the trial court erred (1) in upholding the commission’s approval to resubdivide property and to permit the use of a right of way in a manner that the commission had previously prohibited, despite the failure of the commission to show that circumstances or conditions had changed, (2) in holding that the plaintiffs had failed to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Michel v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Bradley v. Inland Wetlands AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Brunswick v. Inland Wetlands CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Strong v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.