Legal Opinion
Michel v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 21, 1992No. 10766PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The plaintiffs in this zoning dispute appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing their appeal from the Monroe planning and zoning commission’s decision granting the defendant McDonalds Corporation’s application for a change of zone and for a special exception permit.1 They claim that the trial *316court improperly found that (1) the appeal was moot, (2) the zone change did not constitute spot zoning, (3) the commission did not impose an illegal condition on its decision granting the application, (4) the application was not fatally defective even though the named applicant, McDonalds…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Town of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Campion v. Board of AldermenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Paige v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Daw v. Zoning Board of Appeals of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.