Legal Opinion
Strong v. Conservation Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 4, 1992No. 10807PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.
This appeal arises from the denial of an inland wetlands application by the defendant conservation commission (commission). The plaintiffs own 0.48 acres of land in Old Lyme which form a narrow parcel containing two wetlands. The entire parcel falls within the 100 foot wetlands boundary subject to the regulations.
The plaintiffs filed two applications for permits to develop the site by constructing a house and septic system within the regulated area, but outside the wetlands proper. Both applications were denied by the defendant commission. The plaintiffs appealed the second denial to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- City of New Haven v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Strong v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- United Jewish Center v. Town of BrookfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Consolini v. Inland Wetlands Commission of TorringtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.