Legal Opinion
West Virginia v. Ohio Hazardous Waste Facility Approval Board
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1986No. 86-153PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants first argue that the applicant for a hazardous waste facility permit is required by R.C. 3734.05(C)(6)(c) to produce evidence of alternative technologies in order to prove that its facility represents the minimum adverse environmental impact. If it does not, the board may not issue the permit. Although this proposition is certainly correct, we find that it has no application to the instant cause for the following reasons.
R.C. 3734.05(C)(6) provides:
“The board shall not approve an application for a hazardous waste facility installation and operation permit unless it finds and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- City of Columbus v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board v. Central Cadillac Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Cleveland v. Budget Commission of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by23 opinions
- TWISM Ents., L.L.C. v. State Bd. of Registration for Professional Engineers & SurveyorsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Hawkins v. Marion Correctional InstituteOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Althof v. Ohio State Bd. of Psycho., Unpublished Decision (3-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Greenpeace, Inc. v. Waste Technologies IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Kingsley v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.