Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Budget Commission of Cuyahoga County

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1977No. 76-1079PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s principal argument is that the board acted unreasonably and unlawfully upon the appeal brought under R. C. 5705.37,* in that it failed to independently determine the relative need of the city of Cleveland. However, in its decision upon remand the board remarked that “* * * under date of May 29, 1975, we journalized an entry and decision wherein we determined the relative needs of the various communities over which the Cuyahoga County Budget Commission has jurisdiction and allocated the 1975 Cuyahoga County Local Government Fund.”

Paragraph seven of the syllabus in Wheeling Steel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Village of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. City of Brook Park v. Cuyahoga County Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. City of Toledo v. Lucas County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Russell Township v. Geauga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. West Virginia v. Ohio Hazardous Waste Facility Approval BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board v. Central Cadillac Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Canton v. Stark County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. City of Lima v. Allen County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lima v. Allen Cty. Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API