Legal Opinion

Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board v. Central Cadillac Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1984No. 83-1754PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

I

The first of three issues raised by this appeal is whether Central Cadillac’s display of two vehicles at a party held away from its licensed location violated R.C. 4517.03(B), 4517.22(G) or 4517.10. The General Assembly has enacted R.C. Chapter 4517 to regulate the business activities of motor vehicle dealers. These regulations afford protection to the consumer and facilitate the prevention and discovery of automobile thefts.

R.C. 4517.03(B) is the general rule prohibiting motor vehicle dealers from displaying motor vehicles at any place other than an established place of business. That rule…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Cleveland v. Budget Commission of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Althof v. Ohio State Bd. of Psycho., Unpublished Decision (3-8-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. West Virginia v. Ohio Hazardous Waste Facility Approval BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Geroc v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Gwinn v. Ohio Elections CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. N.R., Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API