Legal Opinion
Greenpeace, Inc. v. Waste Technologies Industries
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1993No. 93-3216PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Waste Technologies Industries and Von Roll (Ohio), Inc. (collectively “WTI”), appeal the order issued by the district court at the behest of plaintiffs Greenpeace, Inc., and twelve East Liverpool, Ohio, residents (collectively “Greenpeace”). The order enjoins WTI from continuing limited operation of its East Liverpool hazardous waste incinerator while the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) makes a final permitting decision regarding the facility. Because the district court erred in concluding that it had subject matter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- City of Rochester v. BondCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- In Re Joseph A. Vause and Virgie L. Vause, Debtors. Joseph A. Vause and Virgie L. Vause v. Capital Poly Bag, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Estate of Gerson v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
- Black Warrior River-Keeper, Inc. v. Drummond Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. 3M Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
- Cheteni v. VellaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.