State v. Boyd Transfer & Storage Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Appeal from a judgment affirming an order of the Railroad and Warehouse Commission directing appellant, Boyd Transfer & Storage Company (which has declined to comply with the statute about to be considered), to “cease and desist from operating as an auto transportation company engaged in the transportation of household goods * * * over the public highways between different localities or communities within the state of Minnesota not being contiguous villages or cities.”
The ultimate question is whether appellant, in that portion of its motor transport business hereinafter considered, is subject…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. DeisterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Holmes v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Chelan Transfer Co. v. FooteWashington Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blumenthal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. Reliable Transportation Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. LefebvreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Claypool v. Lightning Delivery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- North Shore Fish & Freight Co. v. North Shore Business Men's Trucking Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.