Legal Opinion
North Shore Fish & Freight Co. v. North Shore Business Men's Trucking Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 1, 1935No. 30,500PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiffs are and ever since December 3, 1925, have been duly authorized to transport property betAveen Duluth and Grand Marais and intermediate points as common carriers, with certain restrictions not material here, such authority having been appropriately granted by the railroad and warehouse commission. Both have made investments in transportation equipment in substantial amounts, and, prior to defendant’s entry into the competitive field of transportation upon this line, enjoyed profits from their operations. They are the only transportation agencies so…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Allied Truck Owners Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Davis v. People Ex Rel. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Goldsworthy v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Parlett Co-Operative, Inc. v. Tidewater Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnston v. L. B. Hartz Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State & Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- State and R. R. W. H. Comm. v. R.I. M. T. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. Murphy Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Southeast Shippers Ass'n v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.