New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Deister
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The plaintiff operates a railroad between Boston and Brockton through the intermediate municipalities of Milton, Quincy, Braintree, Randolph, Holbrook and Avon under a valid franchise conferred by this Commonwealth. It has a large amount of property invested in this enterprise, on which it pays a considerable annual tax. It *180has complied with all controlling laws and in the exercise of its franchise operates trains as a common carrier of passengers for hire. The defendant operates motor vehicles known as "motor buses or coaches” for the carriage of passengers for hire on public highways…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Burgess v. Mayor of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Commonwealth v. SlocumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Interstate Busses Corp. v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Slome v. Chief of Police of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- DeBlasiis v. Bartell & OlivetoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- First National Stores Inc. v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.