Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Deister

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1925PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiff operates a railroad between Boston and Brockton through the intermediate municipalities of Milton, Quincy, Braintree, Randolph, Holbrook and Avon under a valid franchise conferred by this Commonwealth. It has a large amount of property invested in this enterprise, on which it pays a considerable annual tax. It *180has complied with all controlling laws and in the exercise of its franchise operates trains as a common carrier of passengers for hire. The defendant operates motor vehicles known as "motor buses or coaches” for the carriage of passengers for hire on public highways…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Burgess v. Mayor of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Commonwealth v. SlocumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Interstate Busses Corp. v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Kenyon v. City of ChicopeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Slome v. Chief of Police of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. DeBlasiis v. Bartell & OlivetoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. First National Stores Inc. v. H. P. Welch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API