Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Adams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1965No. 116PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The Board of Commissioners of Buncombe County in conjunction with the State Stream Sanitation Committee created in the manner provided by G.S. 153-295 through 324 the Metropolitan Sewerage District of Buncombe County. Prior to the creation, the city, the three towns, and nine of the ten sanitary sewerage districts each maintained its individual sewerage system. The tenth (Venable Sanitary District) did not have “a public sewerage collection system.” All of the several systems discharged raw sewage into the French Broad River or into its tributary, Hominy Creek. Many of the discharge outlets…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Plant Food Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Town of Grimesland v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Moore v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Dare County v. MaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Maxwell v. Michael P. Doyle, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Matter of Estate of PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Rodin v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. City of Gastonia v. Duke Power CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API