Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Michael P. Doyle, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 2004No. COA03-475PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiff William A. Maxwell sued defendant Michael P. Doyle, Inc., alleging that he was entitled, under an oral agreement, to half of the commission received upon the sale of an apartment complex. At trial, the court granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs evidence. Because we hold that plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of breach of an enforceable agreement to withstand a motion for a directed verdict, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Facts

William A. Maxwell is a real estate broker and agent specializing in commercial properties in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. In Re the Will of BuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Freese v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bradley Woodcraft, Inc. v. BoddenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Connor v. HarlessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Pritchett & Burch, PLLC v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Brissett v. First Mount Vernon Industrial Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Lambert v. Town of SylvaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API