Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Nelson
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 10, 1927No. Docket No. 5200PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs through the alleged negligence of defendant in the operation of an automobile. Defendant denied any negligence on his part and as a separate defense pleaded contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff. Mary E'. Nichols. Trial was had by jury. Plaintiffs recovered judgment for the sum of $8,000, together with costs amounting to the further sum of $343.45. Various grounds are urged for a reversal of the judgment. It is first claimed that the verdict is unsupported by the evidence in that it fails to show negligence on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ramsbottom v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Williamson v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hutson v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Will v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. BuyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.