Legal Opinion

San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings v. Bank of Madera

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1898No. Sac. No. 444PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County and from an order appointing a receiver. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion in this case, and in the opinion in San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of Savings v. Bank of Madera, ante, p. 539.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

Appeals by defendants from a judgment and a subsequent order appointing a receiver. The main facts in the-case are stated in the opinion rendered on the plaintiff’s appeal from the order' granting a new trial. The judgment included a provision that plaintiff recover from, the defendant Bank of Madera the sum of seventeen hundred and forty-five dollars, rents of the land in dispute, collected by said defendant from June 29, 1895, the date of the deeds made to it by Charles and Mary Dworack, to November 7, 1896, the date of the court’s decision in the case. On February 15, 1897, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guy v. IdeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Bateman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Scott v. Sierra Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Henry v. EvertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Whitney v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. Miller v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API