Legal Opinion

In Re Martinez

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2003No. S103581PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The Penal Code provides that inmates in county jails and state prisons may have their sentences reduced as a reward for their conduct, including work and good behavior. The rate at which inmates accrue credit depends on numerous factors, including whether the confinement is presentence or postsentence. A jury convicted petitioner, her conviction was reversed, and she then pleaded guilty. She now contends her state prison confinement prior to the reversal must be characterized as presentence for credit accrual purposes.

In People v. Buckhalter (2001) 26 Cal.4th 20 [108…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. BrunerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re JoynerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re CerveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. DieckCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API