Legal Opinion

In Re Cervera

California Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2001No. S075310PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review in this cause in order to settle an important issue arising under what is popularly, and singularly, known as the “Three *1075Strikes” law, a pair of statutes that are identical in part pertinent here, one enacted from a bill introduced in the Legislature (Stats. 1994, ch. 12, § 1, pp. 71-75, adding Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i)), the other enacted from an initiative measure presented to the people (Prop. 184, § 1, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 8, 1994), adding Pen. Code, § 1170.12).

Notwithstanding any other law or provision of law, the Three Strikes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. West Pico Furniture Co. v. Pacific Finance LoansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Isaac Ramirez v. R.A. Castro, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API