People v. Bruner
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
Penal Code section 2900.5 provides that a convicted person shall receive credit against his sentence for all days spent in custody, including presentence custody (subd. (a)), but “only where the custody to be credited is attributable to proceedings related to the same conduct for which the defendant has been convicted” (subd. (b), italics added). The statute’s application is clear when the conduct that led to the conviction and sentence was the sole cause of the custody to be credited. But difficult problems arise when, as often happens, the custody for which credit is sought…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MirandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. PinholsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- In Re ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.