Legal Opinion

In Re Young

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2004No. S106706PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

We must decide whether the Director of Corrections’ discretion to reduce a prisoner’s sentence up to 12 months for “performing] a heroic act in a life-threatening situation” (Pen. Code, 1 § 2935), is subject-to the “Three Strikes” law’s limitation on postsentence credits to 20 percent of the prisoner’s sentence. (§§ 667, subd. (c)(5) (hereinafter section 667(c)(5)), 1170.12, subd. (a)(5).)

We conclude that a “reduction of the sentence” under section 2935 is distinct from credits under the Three Strikes law, and thus, is not subject to its 20 percent limitation. (§§ 667(c)(5),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. SaffellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Alameda Produce Market, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API