Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1941No. Gen. No. 41,428PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

An action for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff. Defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s second amended complaint was allowed and the cause was dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.

This appeal presents for decision the sole question as to whether or not plaintiff complied with the statute requiring notice of injury to be filed with the city attorney and city clerk within six months from the date of the injury.

The sixth paragraph of the second amended complaint reads as follows:

“Sixth: That Section…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walters v. City of OttawaIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Minnis v. FriendIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Curry v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Erford v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Ouimette v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Caron v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. City of Chicago v. James E. Mulligan Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. Fry v. Willamalane Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Heck v. City of KnoxvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Ernestine Hirshfeld, of the Estate of Sam H. Hirshfeld v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API