Legal Opinion
Fry v. Willamalane Park & Recreation District
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 25, 1971PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Plaintiff, as guardian ad litem for her 11-year-old son, filed this action for his injuries sustained on July 14, 1968, when he fell from an unrailed bridge con structed and maintained in one of its public parks by the Willamalane Park & Eecreation District, a municipal corporation. The complaint alleges Willamalane at the time and place in question was acting both in a governmental and a proprietary capacity.
The complaint further alleges that within 45 days of the injury,
“* * =» Pacific Indemnity Company, agent for Willamalane Park & Eecreation District, obtained a written statement from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Galbreath v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Vendrell v. School District No. 26COregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Rand v. AndreattaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Harte v. City of Eagle RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- O'Connell v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Independent School Dist. of Boise City v. CallisterIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Besette v. Enderlin School District No. 22North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Baker v. State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.