Legal Opinion
Moore v. Chertoff
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 7, 2006No. Civil Action 00-953 (RWR)(DAR)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs and defendant have moved for reconsideration of the March 30, 2006 Memorandum Opinion and Order (“March 2006 Opinion”), which ruled that plaintiffs could not plead their untimely filed claims dating back to 1974 under a theory of equitable estoppel, but plaintiffs’ claims concerning the building blocks of promotion had been vicariously exhausted and could be pled in the amended complaint. Plaintiffs argue that they are nonetheless entitled to bring non-promotion claims dating back to 1993 because they have alleged a continuing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Ricki Helfer, Chairman, FdicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- McKenzie v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Joseph Foster v. Albert Gueory, Ronald Dorsey, and Rudolph J. Thornton v. Local 2311 of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Greer v. Board of Trustees University of District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Paul v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Moore v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Howard v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.