Legal Opinion
Howard v. Gutierrez
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 18, 2008No. Civil Action 05-1968 (JDB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Janet Howard, Tanya Ward Jordan, and Joyce Megginson, proceeding pro se, bring this civil action against Carlos M. Gutierrez, the Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce (“Department” or “DOC”). In Count One, plaintiffs allege a disparate impact claim of racial discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. In Count Two, Megginson asserts a disability discrimination claim pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. Currently before the…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Estate of Gaither Ex Rel. Gaither v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Janet Howard v. Penny PritzkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Palmer v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Doe v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.