Legal Opinion

State v. Pierson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 6, 2001No. 19005-6-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brown, A.C.J.

Eugene L. Pierson entered an Alford1 plea in Spokane County to one count of third degree child rape. Over Mr. Pierson’s timeliness objection, he was ordered to pay restitution. He appealed. Today, we decide an issue of first impression, whether a trial court that, at sentencing, requires a restitution hearing within 60 days, may continue the restitution hearing after the 60 days has expired to another date within the 180-day statutory limit. We decide it can, and affirm.

FACTS

In January 1998, the State charged Mr. Pierson with second degree child rape and third degree child rape;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KolesnikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. State v. KolesnikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. MotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. State v. MotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. PiersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API