Legal Opinion
State v. Pierson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 6, 2001No. 19005-6-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
18 P.3d 1154 (2001)
105 Wash.App. 160
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Eugene Lawrence PIERSON, Appellant.
No. 19005-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel 1.
March 6, 2001.
George M. Ahrend, Spokane, for appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, Deputy Prosecuting Attys., Spokane, for respondent.
BROWN, A.C.J.
Eugene L. Pierson entered an Alford[1] plea in Spokane County to one count of third degree child rape. Over Mr. Pierson's timeliness objection, he was ordered to pay restitution. He appealed. Today, we decide an issue of first impression, whether a trial court at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KrallWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KolesnikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. KolesnikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. MotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. MotterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State of Washington v. Jody Danielle BoringCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013