Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Co. v. King Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided March 1, 1993No. Civ. A. 87-0110 PPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PETTINE, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs American Cyanamid Company and Rohm & Haas have filed a motion for approval of settlements and dismissal of cross-claims against four defendants in this contribution action under § 113(f)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERC-LA”), 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. For the reasons stated below, that motion is granted.
I
Plaintiffs claim that they have reached settlement in principle with four defendants in this action: Con-Lux Coatings, Hercules, Keuffel & Esser, and M & T Chemicals, Inc.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
- United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Lyncott Corp. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Comerica Bank-Detroit v. Allen Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1991
- Amland Properties Corp. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. SCA Services of Indiana, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
- Stearns & Foster Bedding Co. v. Franklin Holding Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Barton Solvents, Inc. v. Southwest Petro-Chem, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Foamseal, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.